Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> Perhaps because it is so easy to write x**(1/3), and if you want a real root > of negative argument, it is -(-x)**(1/3). I consider `x**(1/3)` to be a trap and a bug magnet: many people won't realise that the correct spelling for their situation is actually `def f(x): return -((-x)**(1/3)) if x < 0 else x**(1/3)` and the failure mode of `x**(1/3)` for negative `x` seems suboptimal, in that it happily returns a complex number rather than raising a `ValueError` with a clear message indicating what was wrong. I've seen a good number of Stack Overflow questions from users confused about this exact thing. And not only is that correct spelling unwieldy, but it _still_ doesn't do the right thing for `-0.0`, and if you care about getting that corner case right then the right spelling becomes even more unwieldy. Of course, even with `math.cbrt` in the standard library people will still fall into the `x**(1/3)` trap, but at least we then have a decent replacement to point them to. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44357> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
