Josh Rosenberg <shadowranger+pyt...@gmail.com> added the comment:
Andrei: If designed appropriately, a weakref callback attached to the actual object would delete the associated ID from the dictionary when the object was being deleted to avoid that problem. That's basically how WeakKeyDictionary works already; it doesn't store the object itself (if it did, that strong reference could never be deleted), it just stores a weak reference for it that ensures that when the real object is deleted, a callback removes the weak reference from the WeakKeyDictionary; this just adds another layer to that work. I don't think this would make sense as a mere argument to WeakKeyDictionary; the implementation would differ significantly, and probably deserves a separate class. ---------- nosy: +josh.r _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44140> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
