Daniel Diniz <aja...@gmail.com> added the comment: Thanks for the feedback, Guido!
gvanrossum wrote: > You could maintain this as a locally modified version, but a better > approach would be to make just enough changes to upload.py itself so > that you can write the rest of this script as a *wrapper* around > upload.py. Yes, a wrapper is an option. MvL suggested a patch[1] and for this initial implementation it makes things simpler. IIUC, in this case upload.py would need no changes, as we simply populate existing options with fetched values. > PS. What do you mean by "wish we could expunge the deleted ones"? If > you delete a Rietveld issue it is really gone. If you merely close it, > you can still delete it later. But I'm probably missing something. Yes, you're missing the fact that you were the one saying "wish we could expunge the deleted ones" :) upload.py fetched that from http://bugs.python.org/msg32813 because I told it to: python static/upload.py -R 400608 -F msg32813 [1] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tracker-discuss/2009-March/001875.html _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue400608> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
