Ned Deily <n...@python.org> added the comment:

Sorry you are running into this problem. Alas, Python 3.6 has been in the 
"security-fix-only" phase of its life cycle for over 2.5 years now and will 
reach end-of-life in several months at the end of 2021. Our criteria for 
changes to a "security" branch are:
"The only changes made to a security branch are those fixing issues exploitable 
by attackers such as crashes, privilege escalation and, optionally, other 
issues such as denial of service attacks. Any other changes are not considered 
a security risk and thus not backported to a security branch."

The problem referenced here does not seem to meet those criteria and thus the 
original fix was not considered for backporting to current security branches, 
i.e. 3.8, 3.7, and 3.6. Unless it can be shown that the problem can be 
exploited as an attack vector, it is not eligible to be officially backported 
to 3.6.

However, there is nothing stopping either you or a downstream supplier of 
Python 3.6 (like RedHat) from backporting it yourselves.

https://devguide.python.org/devcycle/#security-branches

----------
resolution:  -> out of date
stage:  -> resolved
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue44804>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to