Łukasz Langa <luk...@langa.pl> added the comment:
Apparently we've got ourselves refleaks with the patches.
It doesn't always reproduce but put test_exceptions -R: in a loop in 3.10 and
soon enough you'll get:
0:00:00 load avg: 4.47 Run tests sequentially
0:00:00 load avg: 4.47 [1/1] test_exceptions
beginning 9 repetitions
123456789
.........
test_exceptions leaked [2, 2, 2, 2] references, sum=8
test_exceptions leaked [2, 2, 2, 2] memory blocks, sum=8
test_exceptions failed (reference leak) in 59.6 sec
== Tests result: FAILURE ==
1 test failed:
test_exceptions
It's much harder to reproduce on 3.9 and 3.8 because test_exceptions has fewer
tests and at least on my MBP finishes twice as fast. I ran 3.9 in a loop for an
hour and no refleak.
----------
resolution: fixed ->
stage: resolved -> patch review
status: closed -> open
versions: +Python 3.10, Python 3.9
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue33930>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
