Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment:
@Pablo: I'm adding you to the nosy list to get your opinion on whether (the backport of) GH-27772 can go into 3.10.0.rc2. Summary: GH-27278 (which I reviewed and approved) and its backports fixed some undefined behaviour in complex exponentiation, but also introduced a behaviour change that affected NumPy: some exponentiation expressions that returned a result in 3.10.0b4 raise an OverflowError in 3.10.0.rc1. GH-27772 reverts the behaviour change but keeps the fix for the undefined behaviour. Can the backport of GH-27772 to the 3.10 branch go in before 3.10.0 final? ---------- nosy: +pablogsal _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44698> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
