Géry <gery.o...@gmail.com> added the comment: @jack__d
Thanks for the rewrite! This is a great expansion. Unfortunately I didn’t have the time to review it before the merge. If I find something to be improved I will let you know. @gvanrossum > Your docs seem to promote the second, whereas I've usually preferred the > former. Are you sure? Yet in your 2003 blog post [*Python main() functions*](https://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=4829) you promoted the opposite idiom `if __name__ == "__main__": sys.exit(main())` over the idiom `if __name__ == "__main__": main()`: > Now the `sys.exit()` calls are annoying: when `main()` calls `sys.exit()`, > your interactive Python interpreter will exit! The remedy is to let > `main()`'s return value specify the exit status. I am interested in the rationale if you changed your mind. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue39452> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
