STINNER Victor <vstin...@python.org> added the comment:
Raymond: > Perhaps these critical code sections should have been left as macros. It is > difficult to assuring system wide inlining across modules. These functions were not converted recently to static inline function. For example, Py_INCREF() was already a static inline function in Python 3.9. I don't think that any decision should be taken before performances have been analyzed in depth. I'm not convinced that there is really a performance regression. I'm not sure how benchmarks are run on Windows. neonene: > I measured overheads of (1)~(4) on my own build whose eval-loop uses macros > instead of them. I don't understand how to read the table. Usually, I expect a comparison between a reference build and a patch build, but here you seem to use 3.10a7 as the reference to compare results. I'm not sure that geometric means can be compared this way. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue45116> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
