Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> added the comment:
> Wouldn't a nicer resolution for this be to change `iter` Unfortunately that isn't backwards-compatible. Some people may explicitly want their iterators to not be iterables to guarantee that people who want an iterator get a fresh/new one instead of reusing a live iterator. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue45250> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
