neonene <nicesal...@gmail.com> added the comment:
> + <Platform></Platform> This is bad if ARM64 machine takes the blank value as not "ARM64" but "ARM", as "ARM" tools are not necessary to install. Then, I agree with the proposal of the OP (PR28491) below: > Would it be acceptable if a new host platform property is added to > the project file and keep x64 or x86 as default (depends on target) > but allow users to configure a different host platform to allow > native arm64 compilation? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue46427> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
