Terry J. Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> added the comment:
The first alpine315-tests.txt appears to be a truncated version of the second. Were you expecting the first to be automatically replaced? Should it be unlinked? https://www.alpinelinux.org "Alpine Linux is a security-oriented, lightweight Linux distribution based on musl libc and busybox." Fron the doc linked above: # Maintainer: Natanael Copa <nc...@alpinelinux.org> ## I nosied Natanael at his CLA-signed Alpine id. # Contributor: Sheila Aman <sheila@vulpine.house> ... # musl related fail="test__locale test_locale test_strptime test_re" # various musl locale deficiencies fail="$fail test_c_locale_coercion" fail="$fail test_datetime" # hangs if 'tzdata' installed fail="$fail test_os" # fpathconf, ttyname errno values fail="$fail test_posix" # sched_[gs]etscheduler not impl fail="$fail test_shutil" # lchmod, requires real unzip Should we change CPython tests to accommodate things that are missing (versus buggy). Should the tests requiring sched_[gs]etscheduler be skipped if missing? Or are they required to be 'posix' and is test_posix meant to test completeness as well as correctness of what is present? ---------- nosy: +ncopa, terry.reedy _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue46390> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
