Tim Peters <t...@python.org> added the comment:
Raised the priority back to normal. I agree with Dennis's observation that PyDict_Next is safe, provided it's used as intended: it returns borrowed references, but to things that absolutely are legitimate at the time. In the presence of mutations, *what* it returns isn't defined at all, but I don't see a way for it to blow up (unless its caller screws up by believing it owns the references). It doesn't assume anything about the structure of the dict across calls. ---------- nosy: +tim.peters priority: low -> normal _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue46615> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
