hydroflask <hydrofl...@yqxmail.com> added the comment:
@corona10 I really hope I am not being annoying at this point :) One final nit, in this line: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/31224/files#diff-706e65ee28911740bf638707e19578b8182e57c6a8a9a4a91105d825f95a139dR168 You do not have to check if nargs > 0. alloca() can handle the case when nargs == 0. The usage of alloca() in callproc.c does not check for nargs > 0 either. Otherwise thanks for this enhancement! ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue46323> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
