Stanley <[email protected]> added the comment:
Vedran's got a good point, as existing documentation for math.nan already says
"... Equivalent to the output of float('nan')."
so it does seem a bit redundant to say both, though I wonder if we should still
be explicit since
>>> import math
>>> math.nan is math.nan
True
>>> float('nan') is float('nan')
False
so they don't have the exact same behavior.
Serhiy also has a good point, so maybe instead say that Math.nan/float('nan')
is *generally* not equal to any other value?
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue47031>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
