Géry <gery.o...@gmail.com> added the comment: Thanks for the review.
@rhettinger > And adding classmethod() support in super_descr_get() would create tight > coupling where there should be separate concerns (no other descriptor call is > classmethod specific). The descriptors `super`, `property`, and functions are already `classmethod` specific since their `__get__(instance, owner=None)` methods return `self` if `instance` is `None`, aren’t they? > The OP's proposed use case is mildly plausible though I've never seen it the > arise in practice. I agree that the parameterized factory method use case might be too rare to be compelling. @gvanrossum > That was perhaps a good idea 20 years ago, but nowadays you can use > argument-less super() Yes this proposal is likely too late. I found your autosuper solution quite elegant (no compiler magic) so I wanted to make it work with `classmethod` too after I realized it doesn’t, thanks to Michele’s article. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue44090> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
