R David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment: On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 at 09:29, jvdias wrote: > jvdias <jason.vas.d...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Thanks for responding !
You are welcome. If you want something to happen, though, you'll have to get support from the community and submit a patch. > Can't Python provide a better print() implementation or a fflush() > implementation that will enable print()'s buffers to be flushed ? > Perhaps something like PERL's IO::Handle::autoflush() ? Is there some way in which sys.stdout.flush() is not equivalent to "an fflush implementation that will enable print()'s buffers to be flushed"? > Maybe I should raise another "fflush() support required" bug ? If it's a real issue, yes. But I don't think it is. --David ---------- nosy: +r.david.murray-old _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5725> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
