STINNER Victor <victor.stin...@haypocalc.com> added the comment: > For the second, I don't understand why you want to > compare the return result with RLIM_INFINITY: PyInt_AsLong > returns -1 to signal failure; is there some guarantee that > RLIM_INFINITY == -1 if it's defined?
rlim_t is an unsigned type. The idea of sign_warning_resource.patch was to make gcc quiet about signed/unsigned comparaisons. RLIM_INFINITY is defined as (rlim_t)-1. But it looks that it's not clear, so I wrote another patch to fix the warnings. ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13904/sign_warning_resource-2.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5933> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
