Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: With Giampaolo's suggested change, all tests pass. My understanding of what asyncore/asynchat is intended to do and how it might be used in practice is weak, so I don't feel qualified to comment on the correctness of the change.
> One of the issues with using the method that Giampaolo describes, which > I explained to him, is that generally if someone sends you data, you > want to receive it. You can get both data and the signal that someone > disconnected, in particular, with asynchat's .close_when_done() method. Is it possible to add a test for this sort of situation, to make sure that future changes take it into account? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue5798> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
