Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> added the comment: On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Antoine Pitrou<rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > >> Ah. How about only doing back-translation when protocol=2 (or lower) >> is explicitly selected? > > Well, this is exactly what is implemented!
Ah, I missed that. Fine then! >> I don't much like that 3.0 will be to read pickles written by 3.1 with >> the default protocol (i.e. 3), > > I suppose you meant to say "will be unable", Indeed. > but it isn't, since > protocol 3 pickles are not affected at all by this patch. Good. So I'm okay with the status quo -- too bad 3.0 can't read those pickles, but that's the deal with abandoning 3.0... ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue6137> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
