Alexandre Vassalotti <alexan...@peadrop.com> added the comment: Here's an updated version of my lsprof.py module. I fixed a few bugs, includes the awful reference leak that was present in the previous version (i.e., the profiler code was keeping a reference to every frame executed).
I consider the lsprof.py code functionally equivalent to _lsprof. Now, I am wondering if I should add the features from profile.py missing in _lsprof, e.g., the bias argument and the calibration code. ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14463/lsprof.py _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2919> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
