Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> added the comment: Raymond, I know you see this differently, but personally I don't see a problem with 2.7 getting additional backports of 3.x features, as long as they are backwards compatible. While personally I wouldn't spend effort on this particular backport, I don't see a problem when someone volunteers a patch. In this specific case, I am fine with accepting set literals and set comprehensions as new syntax. I do agree that repr() needs to be kept the same as it was under 2.6.
---------- assignee: gvanrossum -> _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2335> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
