Martin v. Löwis <mar...@v.loewis.de> added the comment: > When building of an extension has failed due to external reasons (e.g. > headers from too old version of a Python dependency), user might prefer > to be forced to fix these reasons, than to have Python built without an > extension.
Ok - but your patch does not implement that. If the extension fails to compile because the header files are not installed at all, even with your patch, there is no error indication. So according to your requirements, your patch is incorrect. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue6731> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
