Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: Sorry: ignore that last message; I was talking through my hat. I think I must have been unwittingly building in debug mode.
Ahem. After a 'make distclean', I get the following results (same specs as above, on a 2.53Ghz MacBook Pro / Core 2 Duo). original: 783.8 ms patched: 373.5 ms (2.1 x faster) patch 2: 323.7 ms (2.4 x faster) patch 2 (attached) is Gawain's original patch, but with the base != 2,8,10,16 code removed and the call to _inplace_divrem1 inlined and slightly reorganized. (No changes to intobject.c.) ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file14872/base10_conversion_performance_patch2.txt _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue6713> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
