Marc-Andre Lemburg <m...@egenix.com> added the comment: Marc-Andre Lemburg wrote: > > Regarding the apostrophe: the Unicode standard doesn't appear to > include any rule regarding that character and its use in titles > or upper-case versions of text. The apostrophe itself is a > non-cased code point. > > It's likely that the special use of the apostrophe in English > is actually a language-specific use case. For those, it's (currently) > better to implement your own versions of the conversion functions, > based on the existing methods.
Looking at the many different uses in various languages, this appears to be the better option: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostrophe To make things even more complicated, the usual typewriter apostrophe that you find in ASCII is not the only one in Unicode: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostrophe#Unicode ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7008> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
