Tarek Ziadé <ziade.ta...@gmail.com> added the comment: > A metadata system, by definition, has to remain reasonably stable > (or be version-numbered, such that old metadata can be recognized properly).
That's already the case. We have 1.0 and 1.1. 1.1 is used if you add fields like "obsoletes". > You can certainly add fields, but replacing existing fields with > others should be sufficiently motivated. Yes, that why the proposed change is backward compatible: it doesn't replace "Author" but turn it into a multi-valued field like "Classifier". Either you have one author line, and the metadata is 1.0 or 1.1, Either you have several authors, and the metadata is 1.2 and doesn't modify Author but add more of those lines. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue6992> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
