Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: Hmm. I don't understand that backtrace at all. It seems to say that the conversion of this particular double value (2.34e17) to long is causing some kind of arithmetic exception. I'd assume overflow, except that the configure script says sizeof(long) == 8, and a 64-bit long should be plenty large enough to hold the result of the conversion.
Is it possible that the configure script is somehow ending up with the wrong value for SIZEOF_LONG? Or do C longs definitely have width 64 on this platform? ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7296> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
