New submission from ulrik <ulrik.sverd...@gmail.com>: The module pkgutil has no documentation of functions added after its introduction, in the official python documentation collection.
http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/library/pkgutil.html The module is well documented with docstrings. I assume the module's exposed functions, some very useful, are open for public use, for example pkgutil.iter_modules and .walk_packages. Is all that is required copying the docstrings into the documentation? If someone believes only Python insight and knowledge of reST sytax is enough to make some passable documentation from the existing docstrings, I could submit a patch for that. ---------- assignee: georg.brandl components: Documentation messages: 95132 nosy: englabenny, georg.brandl severity: normal status: open title: pkgutil lacks documentation for useful functions type: feature request versions: Python 3.2 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7303> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
