Jason R. Coombs <jar...@jaraco.com> added the comment: Brian, thanks for the review. I really appreciate it. I'll fix all of the identified issues.
> Lib/test/test_posixpath.py > - Lines 365-366 - why check has_symlink() and immediately check it > again? In the unpatched code, there were two calls that checked for the existence of 'symlink' in the os module. I thought it strange too, but left it assuming it was there for some reason and not wanting to over extend beyond my primary objective. I will rewrite that test to use only one check unless someone posts otherwise. ---------- title: Add os.link() and os.symlink() and os.path.islink() support for Windows -> Add os.link() and os.symlink() and os.path.islink() support for Windows _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1578269> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
