R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> added the comment:

Actually, the list Terek posted a link to is a public doc page, and as was made 
clear in the recent issue about the check_warnings helper, we do have to 
maintain backward compatibility.  

There (should be) undocumented stuff in test_support, purposely left 
undocumented so that we *don't* have to maintain backward compatibility.  
Myself I wish that doc page didn't even exist.  Putting stuff that users can 
use into unittest is a much better idea.

Maybe we could move the appropriate stuff and get rid of the test_support doc 
page altogether.  And when we move stuff to unittest maybe we could take the 
opportunity to clean up any warts in the interfaces.

----------
nosy: +georg.brandl, r.david.murray
priority:  -> low
type:  -> feature request

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8273>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to