Andrew Bennetts <s...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment: Are there any platforms that define HAVE_SIGINTERRUPT but that do not define HAVE_SIGACTION? If there are, then yes I expect they would fail that test.
It would be a shame to delay this fix just because it doesn't fix all platforms... is it possible to mark that test as a known failure on a platform with siginterrupt but without sigaction? My initial comment outlined a change that would work for all platforms, but would be more complex. (I think the signal_noreinstall.diff change would be good to make even with the more complex approach, though.) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8354> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
