Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopol...@gmail.com> added the comment:
I am +1 for adding these features and I have only one comment on the code: It is documented in time.strptime() documentation that """ The default values used to fill in any missing data when more accurate values cannot be inferred are (1900, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, -1). """ http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/library/time.html#time.strptime and "datetime.strptime(date_string, format) is equivalent to datetime(*(time.strptime(date_string, format)[0:6]))." according to datetime module documentation. Thus, datetime.strptime("", "") returning datetime.datetime(1900, 1, 1, 0, 0) is not an implementation detail and there is no need to compute it in time_strptime. ---------- nosy: +Alexander.Belopolsky _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1100942> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
