Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > I stand corrected. However, I'm going to have to think of a > completely different approach for carrying out that functionality as I > don't know how the take_gil() function is able to determine whether > gil_last_holder has been deleted or not.
Please note take_gil() currently doesn't depend on the validity of the pointer. gil_last_holder is just used as an opaque value, equivalent to a thread id. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue7946> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
