Martin v. Löwis <mar...@v.loewis.de> added the comment: I really, really, REALLY think that it is bad to mix issues. This makes patch review impossible.
This specific issue is about introducing an fsdecode and fsencode function; this is what the bug title says, and what the initial patch did. Whether or not byte-oriented access to environment variables is also needed is a *separate* issue. -1 on dealing with that in this report. FWIW, I'm +0 on adding these functions. MAL, please stop messing issue subjects. If you are fundamentally opposed to adding such functions, please request that a PEP be written or something. Otherwise, I accept the original patch. I'm -1 on issue8514.patch; it is out-of-scope of the issue. ---------- resolution: -> accepted _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8514> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
