Daniel Stutzbach <dan...@stutzbachenterprises.com> added the comment:
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Martin v. Löwis <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> 1. add a flag to PyModuleDef, indicating whether the module was built in
> UCS-2 or UCS-4 mode. Then let the interpreter refuse the load the module,
> instead of having the dynamic linker do so.
> 2. provide a mode for the header files where Py_UNICODE is not defined. add
> another flag to PyModuleDef indicating whether that mode was used when
> compiling the extension.
I notice that PyModule_Create currently works like this:
PyAPI_FUNC(PyObject *) PyModule_Create2(struct PyModuleDef*, int apiver);
#define PyModule_Create(module) \
PyModule_Create2(module, PYTHON_API_VERSION)
Instead of modifying PyModuleDef, what if we changed PyModule_Create
to something like the following?
PyAPI_FUNC(PyObject *) PyModule_Create3(struct PyModuleDef*, int apiver);
#define PyModule_Create(module) \
PyModule_Create3(module, PYTHON_API_VERSION, PYTHON_UNICODE_SETTING)
In most cases that will Just Work, without requiring the module writer
to modify their PyModuleDef.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8654>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
