Meador Inge <[email protected]> added the comment:
> Granted, yes. But I wouldn't expect the same padding for 'BT{BI}' and
> 'BBI'. 'BT{BI}' should match a C struct which itself has an embedded
> struct. For C, I get the following results on my machine:
I wasn't sure. The C99 standard does not specify what the behavior should be.
It is implementation defined. I guess most implementations just set the
alignment of the struct with the alignment of its most demanding member.
I need to change how the alignment for nested structures is computed. Right
now alignments are being computed as if the 'T{...}' codes were not there. I
will hold off until we decide what that rule should be, but I think the most
demanding element rule seems reasonable.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue3132>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
