Alex Samuel <a...@alexsamuel.net> added the comment: How about saving the original value of STR(pnum) and restoring it after calling ast_for_atom()?
This is not thread-safe, but I don't understand Python's threading model well enough to know whether the GIL is held in this function. On 6/17/2010 8:40 AM, Mark Dickinson wrote: > > Mark Dickinson<dicki...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Fixed in r82043 (py3k) and r82044 (release31-maint), simply by removing the > relevant 'if' block. > > For 2.x, Antoine (on IRC) pointed out that there might well be third party > code that depends on -0x80000000 being an int rather than a long (32-bit > machine), so changing that behaviour could cause breakage. > > Can anyone propose a fix that doesn't change behaviour? > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker<rep...@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue9011> > _______________________________________ ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9011> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
