Stefan Krah <stefan-use...@bytereef.org> added the comment: Martin v. Löwis <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Of course, it is dubious why EOF is not tested separately rather than > > passing it to Py_ISALNUM(). Micro-optimization? At least a comment > > should be added. > > No, I think this is an error that EOF is not processed separately. > Otherwise, char 255 may be confused with EOF.
Indeed. I think Py_ISALNUM() should check for EOF, to be consistent with the C isalnum(int c). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9020> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
