Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > As for Hg support, enough people seem to run mq on top of svn to make > this a reasonable thing to add now and to change once the transition > occurs.
Yes, but the question is what workflow it should assume. If you are running mq for example (or pbranch, or doing local named branches), using a simple "hg status" of the working copy will not do the right thing. (and, by the way, you can't assume mq is the favourite workflow out of there: I for example use clones + local named branches instead) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8999> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
