Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > Antoine, there does need to be repeatablity; there's no question about > that.
Well, that doesn't address my proposal of making it repeatable accross bugfix releases only. There doesn't seem to be a strong use case for perpetual repeatability. If some people really need perpetual repeatability, I don't understand how they can rely on Python anyway, since we don't make any such promise explicitly (or do they somehow manage to read in your mind?). So, realistically, they should already be using their custom-written deterministic generators. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9025> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
