Gustavo Niemeyer <gust...@niemeyer.net> added the comment: Please note that even if unpacking such a tar might be semantically equivalent to a version which strips out the "./" prefix, it should be possible to create a tar with valid path names such as these.
In the case of debs, for instance, the files inside the tarball may contain expected path names, which means that some (badly done, perhaps) tools could *expect* the file to be exactly that which is created by the standard tools (e.g. "./debian/control"), and break down once it's not found. With this in mind, it would indeed be nice to be able to use paths prefixed with "./" in Python's tarfile. ---------- nosy: +niemeyer _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9071> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com