Raymond Hettinger <rhettin...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
Am rejecting this feature request because of the concerns mentioned in the post on 4/3. The current requirement for explicit forwarding may be slightly inconvenient to type but it does add provide clarity that the method should be applied to the next-in-mro instead of the super object itself. I appreciate the idea but think it would complicate an object that is already very difficult to understand and use correctly. ---------- assignee: collinwinter -> rhettinger resolution: -> rejected status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1498363> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
