Joseph Schaeffer <thir...@gmail.com> added the comment: Thanks for looking into it! I'm glad that issue will be fixed, as at least one website was actually recommending using .jumpahead(i) for i in 1..100 for independent seed.
I suspect in my use case I'll want to continue my previous methods; I work with stochastic Markov processes and I need to seed a large number (10k+) of generators - one per trajectory - and also have the requirement of needing a deterministic PRNG. So having a single Mersenne Twister seed plus salting values that worked with .jumpahead would be a simpler representation; my previous code in C did basically that with a LCG to create those seeding values for the Mersenne Twister. So that's roughly equivalent [I think?] to the fixed random.jumpahead. Thanks again! ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9816> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
