Matthew Woodcraft <matt...@woodcraft.me.uk> added the comment: > (1) Shouldn't 'reverse=True' be omitted in the second doc > addition?
Yes, of course, sorry. > (2) I'd also suggest adding a brief comment about what this > means for distinct, but equal, objects; otherwise it's not > really obvious what the point of the doc addition is. > (3) As a matter of clarity, perhaps replace "this is" with > "max(iterable, key=key) is", and similarly for min. I've attached a new patch incorporating these suggestions. ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file18858/functions.rst.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9802> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
