Antoine Pitrou <pit...@free.fr> added the comment: > Right. That's why I'm thinking that we should introduce some. TLS > creation *can* fail, and it is unfortunate that the original > introduction of this API forgot to consider that. Your patch did > (de facto) introduce an error return code (originally 0, now -1).
Perhaps we can simply call Py_FatalError() instead? There's not much we can do when such a failure occurs anyway. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9786> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
