Martin v. Löwis <mar...@v.loewis.de> added the comment: > Perhaps we can simply call Py_FatalError() instead? There's not much we > can do when such a failure occurs anyway.
Sounds fine as well. Python's own usage definitely shouldn't fail. If extension modules use this in an aggressive manner, they may actually exhaust TLS keys (at least on Windows, where old versions had only 64 slots). Having the interpreter fail then sounds reasonable. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9786> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
