Martin v. Löwis <mar...@v.loewis.de> added the comment: > Should flush be modified to do nothing in this case or should the unit test > be updated?
Tim is suggesting that flush should indeed become a noop. Since nobody else speaking in favor of it being an error, I guess this is the way to go: flush, on an ACCESS_COPY file, does nothing, and the test is fine as it stands. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue678250> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
