Éric Araujo <mer...@netwok.org> added the comment: > When I was working with 2to3 this summer I was running it via python3, > so I think the patch should work Code in the patch uses print as a keyword (2.x), not a function (3.x). How does that work?
> however, if I've submitted it to the wrong place or the wrong branch, > where should I be looking at to ensure my code does work on 3.2 and > is submitted to the right place? This tracker is the right place for bugs relevant to any CPython version. To ensure your code works on 3.2, just apply the diff on a 3.2 checkout. More info on http://www.python.org/dev/ (especially http://www.python.org/dev/patches/). > In regard to the import gvgraph, I wasn't sure what to do with it If the implicit relative import doesn’t work, as I suspect, sys.path.append(os.path.dirname(__file__)) should be enough. (Cheers from a fellow GSoCer, by the way :) ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue9621> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com