Johann Hanne <pyt...@jf.hanne.name> added the comment: Why exactly are you skeptical? Because it doesn't fix everything in one go? The other changes are also minimal (I'm not even sure if it requires more source changes, maybe I have just to get my #defines right). If you prefer to see a single patch which you can reproduce to fix MinGW compilation completely, I'm willing to do that.
Given that 2.7 is supposed to be a long time support version, I really think people should have a chance to use MinGW. The patch is trivial, but figuring out everything from the compiler error messages can be brain bending. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10504> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
