Alexander Belopolsky <belopol...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Marc-Andre Lemburg <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: .. > The tables were never manually maintained, but we also did not update > Python for each new Unicode version: > > Python 1.6: Unicode 3.0 > Python 2.0: Unicode 3.0 > Python 2.1: Unicode 3.0 > Python 2.2: Unicode 3.0 > Python 2.3: Unicode 3.2 > Python 2.4: Unicode 3.2 > Python 2.5: Unicode 4.1 > Python 2.6: Unicode 5.1 > Python 2.7: Unicode 5.2 > Thank you for the summary. Note that Python reference pages have been updated even less frequently. [1] Since Python language and standard library definitions are now (in 3.x) closely tied to the Unicode definition, I wonder whether unicodedata.unidata_version should be more prominently featured in the docs. (Possibly even included in the Python CLI banner, but that is probably an overkill.) [1] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/docs/2010-November/002074.html ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue10567> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
