Alexander Belopolsky <belopol...@users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
I simplified the partial_repr() code in issue4113b.diff and committed as r86916.
I wonder, however, if for the common case of func being a named function,
displaying func.__name__ or func.__module__ + '.' + func.__name__ in
repr(partial) may be more apropriate than repr(f).
For example,
functools.partial(f, 1, 2, 3, a=5, b={}, c='7')
instead of
functools.partial(<function f at 0x100592d98>, 1, 2, 3, a=5, b={}, c='7')
----------
resolution: -> accepted
stage: needs patch -> committed/rejected
status: open -> pending
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4113>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
